Facebook and Twitter were innovative at the time, and helped businesses form a relationship with clients with a more personal approach, allowing a subtle transition from a purely passive approach to their prospective clients to a more pro-active and personal one.  A lot of folks missed the point of Twitter and Twitter and came late to the party.  The same can be said for the late adopters of Facebook, who didn’t understand their kids’ fascination with the social aspects of Facebook.  College kids live on facebook.  Andif you had any doubt about the centrality of Facebook to the zeitgheist of our society, one need look no further than Michaele and Tarek Salahi’s crashing the Whitehouse state dinner late last month.  Pictures of them and Obama and them and Biden were on their Facebook page before dawn.

I wish I had a nickle for everyone who commented on my embracing the Twitter idiom with a snide comment like, ‘What do I care what people had for breakfast.’  A lot of folks are missing the point of both of these social sites:  they provide a way to form quasi social relationships, and so called weak friendships.  Their point is that people are more apt to do business with people with whom they have some sort of connection.  If you’re looking for someone to re-do your kitchen, you’re much more likely to choose someone from your church, or even someone who is friendly with the butcher whom you lilke.  I am not a big Facebook user because it is too time intensive, but I have met quite a few friends, professional colleagues, and business partners on Twitter.

But Twitter is still a quasi passive platform, though the lines are blurry.  I do know that the easiest way to turn someone off on Twitter is to come onto him with a hard sell:  ‘I’ve made $15,000 this month on Twitter, and I can show you how to do it, too!!!!!’

But thee are now on the horizon two very important developments which promise to significantly enhance the power of using Twitter.

But first a small diversion.  Earlier this year, an enterprising your Australian named Chris Duell developed a site called Twitterhawk.  Now the idea of Twitterhawk is that the site sifts through the Twitterstream looking for key words that you set that occur near a geographic location that you specify.  So if you were a carpenter in Peoria, you might set up a search that looks for kitchen remodeling in Peoria.  Twitterhawk would return to you a list of those tweets,  And, for a few cents a tweet, Twitterhawk would send a series of rotating tweets to those whose tweets you designated as appropriate targets.

Back to those new Twitter innovations.  The first was the implemenjtation of lists on Twitter.  Now you can create lists of folks on Twitter that you follow.  And you can categorize them with common traits, for example software architects (like Paladin Consultants, LLC ), or economists, or photographers.  It helps you keep track of people, especially when you have lots of followers.  You can see the Twitterstreams of these lists, and even get an RSS feed of them.  Better still, in most cases everyone has access to virtually all of everybody else’s lists!

And where can you find and mine these lists?  Listorius is one of the first resources dedicated to managing the new feature.  Mashable also has a growing arsenal of Twitter Lists.  Unless I miss my guess, new sites dedicated to this new tool will be popping up like mushrooms after a spring rain!

The second innovation comes from a site called Listimonkey, a site designed by a very clever young Belgian expatriate named Xavier Damman, now living in the Bay Area.  He has also managed to secure a domain name in his own name!  Anyway, his wrinkle on Twitter is that if you send Listimonkey the name of a twitter list, a key word or phrase, and your email, Listimonkey will email you with a set periodicity the tweets from members of that list contain your key word or phrase!  Now, although there is some SEO juice and pride in having a large list, this is not necessary to work with Listimonkey.  In fact, you can use anybody’s public list!  (Most lists are public.)

Now think about that.  If you are a real estate agent in Chicago, you might watch somebody’s Chicago list for the key word ‘moving’.  If you were a photographer in Atlanta, you’d watch somebody’s Atlanta list for the keyword ‘wedding’ or ‘getting married’.  And, Listimonkey allows you to create as many of these list/keyword combinations as you like!  Very powerful, and a dimensional abstract improvment on Twitterhawk’s idea!

But Listimonkey is good not only for finding new customers and clients.  It’s great for finding out about new products, techniques, people, trends- wealth of information from one site that harnesses the communal information it mines from the Twitterstream!

I’m afraid Xavier’s innovation will spell bad news for Chris Duell and Twitterhawk.  It’s a shame, but the market marches on.  One can only wish Chris Duell luck, and hope that he has another great idea.  But with talent like he’s shown, I am sure that his next idea is right around the corner.

But getting back to Listimonkey, as those emails come rolling in from Listimonkey, it would be pretty easy for a good software developer to come up with a program which would parse those emails as they came in, and then tweet appropriate messages to the originators of those tweets mentioning the keyword(s).  Xavier has such a good idea, that I predict will soon overrun his mailserver.  But that will be an happy problem for him to solve!

Please leave a comment, so we know whether or not we are on target!  It helps us find out what our readers think.

These advances in technology bring benefits and challenges for small businesses like ours.  First, we much do the work for our clients for which they have hired us.  That’s how we get paid and earn our living.  Second, we must find new work, because when current projects are finished, we will need new ones to take their place.  Third, we must continue to learn so that we do not become obsolete and unable to compete.  Unfortunately, only one of these items is directly revenue producing.

Way back before the turn of the century, I remember reading that the amount of knowledge in the world was doubling every five years.  On a visit to my Uncle Joe, who was a senior chemist at duPont at the time, I asked him if he thought this was a true statement, how one could possible know this, if it referred to unique knowledge or many folks knowing the same thing, and all the things a curious kid might ask.  He allowed that he wouldn’t be surprised if it were true, and mused that perhaps it could be measured by the amount of ‘stuff’ written in scientific journals, etc.  The DNA molecule had been modelled, we had put a man on the moon, developed nuclear weapons, and so on.

If it were a true fact them, it is certainly doubling much faster now.  We have the Internet, digitized books and other media, catalogs – all manner of convenient and expanding knowledge and technology.  And there is every indication that these trends will continue- perhaps at an even faster rate.

Animal behaviorists have long been aware of the ‘Honey Dance‘ that bees to to alert other bees to the location of nectar.  A bee will find a source of nectar, then go back to the hive and do a dance that shows the other bees the distance and direction of his (there’s only ONE queen, and SHE doesn’t look for honey!) find.  The bees have developed a way to share information, and use communal intelligence and collective effort to maximize their efficiency in gathering food for the hive.

This brings us to the human honey dance!  Todays writings in blogs and websites in continuing to explode over the internet.  Now I am sure that there are many folks writing things out there that may be of great value to me and my company.  But I have no idea who or where.  That’s where the social networking sites come in.  The early entry was Facebook.  My daughter has a Facebook account since high school, and has about 1000 ‘friends’.  They’re not real friends, of course, but the culture of their tribe mandated that ones population of Facebook ‘friends’ was an indicator of popularity, and therefore success.  But they are almost 1000 people that she can correspond with, ask advice from, and, perhaps have commerce with.  And maybe that’s not so bad a thing!

Facebook was followed in the business worls by LinkedIn.  Now LinkedIn, though limited to 3000 invites per person, can theoretically give you access to 27 billion connections (not counting the folks whi invite you)!  Twitter is another source of these ‘loose connections’.  I’ve seen some folks on twitter with 50,000 plus followers.  The statistics are unclear about how all these connections translate into actual business.  And I do not see managing connections in numbers anywhere near these.  But maybe it’s not about managing connections.  I’ve met some very interesting and smart folks through LinkedIn and Twitter, and have given and gotten a fair number of ideas.  I suspect that in the longer run, within your network of followers, the folks who are able to share new ideas through their reliable ‘Honey Dance’ will eventually earn the respect of the other players in their network, whatever it’s size.